Thursday, November 19, 2009

zionist quotes

zionist quotes

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:30:51 -0600
R264428
3 years ago
microdot

maybe it’s something in the drinking water?


R264430
3 years ago
phoenix_rising

lol, the water stolen from the west bank or the water taken from the med sea?


R264453
3 years ago
nada

ben gurion was pretty much a real asshole wasn’t he.


R264490
3 years ago
FloydAnderson

R264508
3 years ago
LuckyHenry

the following have yet to be research fully

But that doesn’t stop you from posting them like they’re fact, right?

How g’rilla!


R264510
3 years ago
FloydAnderson

Hey LuckyHenryShogo, how about some positive vibrations dude?


R264513
3 years ago
FloydAnderson

R264514
3 years ago
FloydAnderson

R264521
3 years ago
microdot

It’s true however that the Jewish culture is hosting a pathology that is very likely a product of historical precedents for which outside cultures need to take more than a little responsibility.

Every culture has its extremists, Catholics, Protestants and Muslims can all stand up and say, “Guilty as charged”. So can Buddhists and Hindus.

But. Can we see why the Rothschilds might have built an empire fueling both sides of wars?

Can we see why Einstein, Bohr and Oppenheimer might have mindlessly pursued the foundation of nuclear holocaust?

Can we see how someone like Katsav, who’s a Persian, might have hitched a ride with what is essentially a EuroPathology? And they’ve turned on him, haven’t they? Poor bugger.

There’s logic in them there hills. I’m not saying I know what it is. Just that it’s there and we shouldn’t just take the approach of writing them off as crazy mofos.

Others will have more expertise than I, so I hope you’ll pipe in, and I’m a Buddhist, so we don’t do guilt in the first place, but is it true that the Jewish faith does not offer any form of forgiveness or redemption?

Could that be a major source of The Confusion?

Could the Judeo Christian reality system be overwhelming itself with guilt complexes when responsibility complexes would be more useful?

Post Modified: 02/24/07 07:43:22

R264528
3 years ago
microdot

Henry Kissinger. Another great example of a braniac from on oppressed minority outdoing the work of their oppressor.

see also The Famous Nine (a priori elements of the fascist personality)

Post Modified: 02/24/07 07:44:33

R264551
3 years ago
LuckyHenry

Can we see why the Rothschilds might have built an empire fueling both sides of wars?

Why would you accept claims of this at face value?

Can we see why Einstein, Bohr and Oppenheimer might have mindlessly pursued the foundation of nuclear holocaust?

That sentence has a lot of problems.


R264554
3 years ago
athena

“Can we see why Einstein, Bohr and Oppenheimer might have mindlessly pursued the foundation of nuclear holocaust?”

I think the main problem about that sentence is that microdot is a complete fucktard.


R264753
3 years ago
microdot

Come on. Einstein, Bohr AND Oppenheimer AND Kissinger. Very naughty of me inDEED. Although it should be said that Kissinger was the only consciously homicidal mastermind of the four. I didn’t mean to suggest that Albert was in any way conscious of the implications of his work. But that’s precisely the point.

Face value? It’s hard to know what all needs splainin. Here, watch the video

Unfortunately, it’s in two parts, long — and a lecture of fact after fact after fact by a guy who for some reason is constantly shaking a pencil at you.

The Rise of the Rothschilds begins at 28:00. 54:00 will take you straight to the Battle of Waterloo.

Post Modified: 02/25/07 09:32:11

R264757
3 years ago
microdot

OK. I’ll admit. I was just waiting for you to ask. And you did!!!! Two points pour moi.

But it’s true. Twas a might irresponsible. The jury is out as to who exactly funded the French side of the Battle of Waterloo. Here’s the wikie on le sujet :

The basis for the Rothschild fortune was laid during the latter stages of the Napoleonic Wars. From 1813 to 1815, the Rothschild family was instrumental in the financing of the British war effort, handling the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington’s army in Portugal and Spain, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their Continental allies. Through the commissions earned on these transactions, the Rothschild fortune grew enormously.

In the early 19th century Rothschild set up a Europe-wide network of messengers and carrier pigeon stations, gathering information that could affect his investments. He soon garnered a reputation for being first with the news.

According to popular legend, when the Battle of Waterloo was being fought in June 1815, other speculators watched Rothschild’s stocks in an attempt to guess who would win. Shortly after the battle ended, and long before anyone else knew who was the victor, he began selling stocks. Everyone assumed this meant Napoleon had won and Europe was lost. Panic selling ensued. When prices crashed, Rothschild bought everything in sight and made a huge profit.

END OF QUOTE

Here’s the French Rothschild of the time :

An advisor to two kings of France, James de Rothschild was the most powerful banker in the country and following the Napoleonic Wars, played a major role in financing the construction of railroads and the mining business that helped make France an industrial power.

Post Modified: 02/25/07 09:50:30

R264766
3 years ago
Snark

Can somebody clear up for me what purpose this thread serves?

Also…

Can we see why Einstein, Bohr and Oppenheimer might have mindlessly pursued the foundation of nuclear holocaust?

With the exception of Oppenheimer, who actually personally worked on the bomb, none of those three did anything but pursue the research that led, in part, to nuclear physics and the ability to create the bomb. And it was anything but mindless, and to suggest it was is a disrespect; Einstein and Bohr’s research cleared the way for modern cosmology and astrophysics just as much as it did nuclear weaponry. Criticize, if you must, the application of the information, not the information itself. And to imply that because they were Jewish, they were somehow mindlessly compelled to create doomsday devices….well, that’s fucktarded bullshit and you know it is. Never mind that Einstein was not a Zionist…

Post Modified: 02/25/07 09:47:12

R264767
3 years ago
Snark

Can we see why the Rothschilds might have built an empire fueling both sides of wars?

Because it was good business? Why else would they do it? It was a fabulous way to make a LOT of money. Greed for money is not, stereotypes aside, a trait endemic to Jews.

Post Modified: 02/25/07 09:48:43

R264769
3 years ago
microdot

No one said nada about greed being endemic to Jews, I don’t think, until you did. I ain’t saying it. Although I will say that I’m a Socialist, so we’re obviously not going to agree on what it makes sense to sanction as far as the use of money goes. But. That being said, I actually don’t think greed is what motivates the world’s Predatory Capitalists.

And.

I don’t think greed is what’s motivating Israeli zionism either.

So what could it be?

The gig with Einstein & Co is not that they were blinder than the rest of the Industrial World but that they were smarter. This then runs into the theory that being an outsider makes people more intelligent because they don’t get mired in mob consciousness because the mob won’t have anything to do with ‘em.

It’s got nada to do with DNA. It’s a reaction formation. Not necessarily a bad one.

Post Modified: 02/25/07 10:39:22

R264860
3 years ago
Snark

I see. Thanks for the clarification, it was important.


R264869
3 years ago
bodo

For an in depth expose’ on the whole banker/money changer/rothschild scheme, check out The Money Masters

No comments:

Post a Comment

Archived GNN Threads